- From: Geoff Narvronsen <geoffryn@nfocus.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 07:45:36 -0600
- To: www-html@w3.org
>Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 19:51:06 -0600 >To:MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu >From:geoffryn@nfocus.com (Geoff Narvronsen) >Subject:Re: lynx and image maps > >> When someone, such as the person who started this thread, indicates >>a desire to use the Web for Global Information Sharing in a manner which >>takes advantage of image maps for sighted visitors with GUI clients, but >>ensures that the information will be available to all, the suggestion to >>modify the server's image map handling code or script is not always helpful. >>But anyone, no matter how new to the Web, can be instructed to include a >>brief ALT string and make sure that the top left-hand corner of the image >>returns a file suitable for text clients. That can be done by making the >>map's default such a file and not having a hot zone in that corner, or the >>image could indicate explicitly that "clicks" in that corner will return >>such a file (so GUI clients can select it overtly as well). > >the simplest solution to all of this is, of course, anything that the >imagemap will link to, put another, text-based link just below this. > >this should be common sense, and i believe is common practice anyway. > >an example of this is at http://www.apple.com, among others.. > >they have their imagemap with the nifty looking "buttons" on it, each one >linking to a different page.. > >but just below this, they also have: > >[software] [new products] [apple info] [what's hot] [feedback page] > >and the like.. > >so instead of waiting for the html folks to agree on a standard, you can >still have links for all of the text-only browsers. > >GeoffryN >geoffryn@nfocus.com >
Received on Saturday, 3 February 1996 08:42:51 UTC