- From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 12:47:47 -0800
- To: "Warren P. Chi" <warrenpchi@bansheeparadigm.com>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
Warren P. Chi wrote: > What's basically at fault here isn't so much that browsers are going buck-wild trying to > one up each other with eye-candy, its that there is no basic standard to adhere to. And > in the absence of such guidance, chaos reigns. No one is forcing authors to rot attention spans with excessive eye candy. And HTML2.0 is a pretty safe standard to adhere to. > How many of us wish to do away with the "Best viewed with [browser of choice]" comment > found in 99% of the sites out there? How many of us don't want to have to choose > between VBScript & JavaScript? How many of us don't need the hassle of whether people > have the right plug-ins? Yep, these things are annoying. But most have nothing to do with HTML. I have no desire to legislate what enhancements a vendor may or may not include in their product, or what stupid logos an author may or may not include on their pages. > But here's what I really think of MSIE vs. NSN . . . I think NSN should win... And I hope the war rages on in the friendly spirit of competition that drives the search for excellence <music swells>. David Perrell
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 1996 15:51:36 UTC