- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 18:31:16 -0400
- To: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <01I4080KK31U008MM5@SCI.WFBR.EDU>, Foteos Macrides writes: >"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org> wrote: >>[...] >>Please cite a source for this bit about the meaning of '#'. It may >>well be in the specs, but I'd like to see which specs your invoking. >>And even if it's in there, those specs need updating. They contain >>some inconsistencies, mistakes, and bogus ideas like this one. >>[...] > > C'mon Dan! "Show me the specs, but they're inconstistent, >mistaken, and bogus." Yup, that's what I'm saying. I want to see the evidence behind your argument. I always do. That, and I disagree with many of the decisions that were made in the URL RFCs. Check the archives. I'm on record. > (so why bother?) So we can get it straightened out! What else are we doing here? Dan p.s. I still haven't seen an instance where mailto:xxx?subject=yyy or news://server/group cause the interoperability problems you alluded to.
Received on Friday, 26 April 1996 18:31:26 UTC