- From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 19:45:08 -0500 (EST)
- To: MACRIDES@sci.wfbr.edu
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU> wrote: >"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org> wrote: >>[...] >>There's been a lot of noise about revising RFC1738. I'm not sure what >>exactly is going to happen along those lines. > > It needs to make clear that a comma-separated list of conformant >addresses is acceptible in mailto URLs. The current phraseology is subject >to the interpretation that only one address is permitted, but I don't think >that was intended, and it certainly wasn't the existing practice when >1738 became Standards Track. Oh, another thing. Explorer uses semi-colon-separated lists for multiple addresses in mailto URLs, which only works for other Explorers, and Lynx. I've been thinking about this, and, frankly, in Lynx it took approximately 10 minutes to have it handle ?subject=blah and both comma- and semi-colon-separated lists in mailto URLs, and to treat the value of any TITLE attribute as the suggested subject in any Anchor or LINK with a mailto HREF, or FORM with a mailto ACTION. I doubt it would take more than 10 minutes for any client, including the market force and would-be market force clients. So how about this suggestion? Convince Netscape, Microsoft and Spyglass to "get together" and write a W3C draft for all those mailto features, as well as spend the 10 minutes to implement them in all three clients. Then Lynx users could use any of them without worrying about trashing our cheerished interoperability principle. I know, this sounds so snide, but the trashing of the interoperability principle is not considered as "security" problem, and doesn't invoke CERT advisories, and as someone we all admire recently said: "To me, it is far more important to be heard, than the way I sound. I rather have my message not aligned the way I want but understandable, than aligned the way I want, but unreadable." "Oh well, maybe I am odd." And another said: "Me too. But I'm afraid we are the exception." Fote ========================================================================= Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 =========================================================================
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 1996 19:45:04 UTC