- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Apr 1996 22:53:04 -0500
- To: mwm@contessa.phone.net (Mike Meyer)
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <19960318.75802D0.9793@contessa.phone.net>, Mike Meyer writes: >> Alright. I have read from many people that the HTML 3.0 draft is not >> accurate. > >Um, it's a proposed standard, not a description. Bzzzt. Nope, but thanks for playing! EVERYONE! PLEASE! Cite your sources! Stop the spread of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt! HTML 2.0, aka RFC1866, is a proposed standard. But you don't have to take my word for it, cuz I'll cite a source: See: ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1866.txt HTML 3.0 was too big for the working group to swallow all at once, and has expired. The features therein are under discussion in smaller documents. I'll leave it as an excercise for the reader to verify this fact. Dan
Received on Friday, 5 April 1996 22:53:54 UTC