- From: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 12:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
- To: jbw@cs.bu.edu (Joe Wells)
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
> Q: ((HTML PRE Containing FORM)) RFC 1866 says this: > > For example, a <PRE> element may contain a <FORM> element, ... > > This doesn't make any sense because it contradicts the DTD given in the > same document. What's the story here? Looks like a simple typo that got missed during editing. Should of course be: For example, a <FORM> element may contain a <PRE> element, ... One for the errata sheet. Speaking of which, is it possible to maintain a current errata sheet for an RFC, or are the only allowed choices: a) issue a new RFC for each minor error noticed b) let the errors stand, known only to those who wrote the document but not to the readers? -- Chris Lilley, Technical Author and JISC representative to W3C +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Manchester and North HPC Training & Education Centre | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Computer Graphics Unit, Email: Chris.Lilley@mcc.ac.uk | | Manchester Computing Centre, Voice: +44 161 275 6045 | | Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6040 | | M13 9PL BioMOO: ChrisL | | Timezone: UTC URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Monday, 20 November 1995 07:39:30 UTC