- From: kitblake <kitblake@gig.nl>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 16:50:03 +0100
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
Paul Prescod wrote: ....(snipped) >There are other benefits. I believe it would: > > slow the creation of "tomorrow's legacy documents." > dispell the myth that the HTML WG is "against" presentation. > encourage the usage of CLASS, which would contribute to its usage in >robots and other software. > allow us to judge how people use CLASS so that we can think about >standardizing some usages. > increase the awareness of platform portability issues. > put the IETF and W3C back in the driver's seat with respect to the >direction of HTML and the Web. > >---- > >Comments? Ideas? Should I present a more technical specification? I would >imagine the language would be a touched-up subset of the current CSS proposal. A yes vote. This would allow style sheets to have a probationary condition until their use and abuse can be learned from. kitblake ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kitblake@gig.nl Amstel 222 ELECTROGIG Europe 1017 AJ Amsterdam http://www.gig.nl/ The Netherlands ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on Thursday, 27 July 1995 10:49:43 UTC