- From: BearHeart / Bill Weinman <BearHeart@bearnet.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 95 01:59 CST
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 07:12 am 12/28/95 +0100, Philippe-Andre Prindeville wrote: >On Dec 27, 21:16, Michael Seaton wrote: >> bbreak@mit.edu (Ben Breakstone) wrote: >> [ snip ] >> > I believe the absence of typesetter's (or "curly," or "smart") quotation >> > marks from the english HTML entity set to be a grievous omission. Perhaps not as grievous, but a noticable omission as well, are ligatures for "fi", "fl", "ffi", and "ffl", etc. >> These could be hinted at in the current standard by using <Q> </Q>. >> However this is still not a full substitute for having entity names, >> since there will likely be cases in which a solitary quote is desired. >Yes, indeed. You might have several paragraphs all from the same >person, with no interruption. In that case, each paragraph would start >with a left double quote, but no closing quote would be necessary. >So you could make </q> optional, like </p> is. Note: this is >highly language dependent. Not all latin scripted languages follow >this convention. I know French doesn't, for example. Actually, it's worse than that. Different english-speaking locales use quotation marks in different hierarchies. Brittish publishers commonly use single quotes for quotations and double quotes for quotations-within-quotations, while U.S. publishers use them in the opposite order. +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ * BearHeart / Bill Weinman * BearHeart@bearnet.com * * http://www.bearnet.com/ * * Author of The CGI Book: * http://www.bearnet.com/cgibook/ * * "To enjoy life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks." --Lazarus Long
Received on Thursday, 28 December 1995 01:58:18 UTC