- From: Ben Breakstone <bbreak@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 95 18:11:01 EST
- To: www-html@w3.org
Hello! Yet another lurker speaks up, though this one happens to believe HTML is still primarily a text/semantic structuring system, rather than a page description one (isn't that what PostScript is for?). Anyhow, I thought I'd chime in my $0.02 worth of Xmas wishes for HTML. I may be the only one in the world who cares about the first wish, but I consider it most important nonetheless. Here are my three wishes. I believe the absence of typesetter's (or "curly," or "smart") quotation marks from the english HTML entity set to be a grievous omission. There are two main reasons for this. The first reason is that aesthetically, the straight ("dumb") quotes always look cursedly ugly, especially at large type sizes. The accepted practice in typsetting is to use straight quotation marks only for foot and inch descriptions: 6' 7" tall. In a good serif typeface, typesetter's quotation marks are infinitely more beautiful than the straight, blocky variety. The second reason is semantic: typsetter's quotation marks carry much more information than the other kind. The direction of single or double "smart quotes" indicates whether they begin or end a block of speech, or whether a single mark is acting as an apostrophe. "Dumb quotes," on the other hand, provide no clue as to their context. Could those of us who write code get along with just one generic parenthesis or curly brace, substituting for both left and right? I know the issue of an expanded entity set has been touched on before on this list. I think I've also seen left and right curved quotes in the SGML entity set... (my PPP's a long distance charge from here, so I'm not going to check). Perhaps someone who's been here longer could explain why this feature didn't make it in along with the rest of the added latin set. My second wish is a document listing the currently accepted <LINK> relations and the expected browser behavior for each. (And is is REL="MADE" or REL=MADE? Is a "mailto:" URL an acceptable link for all LINKs?> This probably already exists somewhere, but I haven't been able to find it. Can someone here point me? Finally, I'd wish for someone with far, far better coding skills than mine to write a worm to consume all <BLINK> tags. But that may be a bit too invasive for Santa's elves to ethically provide. Heh. Anyhow, a merry Christmas, a happy Chanukah, a joyous Kwanzaa, a lovely Three Kings' Day, and a bountiful Boxing Day to all. Plus any others I left out. (Please excuse my verbosity. The fruitcake must have some odd ingredient.) Warm holiday wishes, Ben -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ben Breakstone bbreak@mit.edu http://hamp.hampshire.edu/~bjbF94/ For PGP public key, finger bjbF94@hamp.hampshire.edu
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 1995 18:11:08 UTC