- From: Michael Godsey <mgodsey@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue Dec 19 11:47:55 1995
- To: www-html-request@w3.org
- Cc: chuck@pipex.net, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: red-63-msg951219164656MTP[01.51.00]000000b1-44391 ---------- | From: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk> | > <P> is not a container object, so there is no </P>. You can throw it | > in, and most browsers won't mind. It's not a required element, though. | > <P> is just a paragraph seperator, not a container. | On the contrary, such misinformation is damaging. Please check your | sources before posting answers. I refer you to RFC 1866. | | For anyone that was confused: Thanks for clearing up the confusion I started. That'll teach me to be more precise. In the interest of trying to clear up a very common "newbie confusion" question I get a LOT (not implying the original poster was a newbie - I just intrepreted the question as being more simplistic than the original intent), I choose to speak in a more conversational tone. Back in the "good 'ole days" this was easier to do, in part because HTML was much less confusing. There weren't a gazillion extensions being bantered about, and people generally knew they were either coding to the 'standard' or using those heathenistic 'extensions'. It ain't so easy now. I wish to *goodness* I had never used the term "container" in my reply. I'm used to speaking to all different levels of users, and have slipped into a more metaphoric way of describing HTML, and sometimes the metaphoric terms actually have a more precise technical meaning. Anyway, my intent was only to show that in most cases (and since the question seemed pretty general, I figured it wasn't worth trying to eludicate on the various cases where the exception would hold) the ENDING TAG for the PARAGRAPH ELEMENT was optional. Simple enough, had I said it that way. Of course, if I have again mis-spoken, I trust all of the sharp-eyed residents here will correct me ;-> (But please, read peoples replies before doing so - we don't all need to hear the same admonsihment over and over.)
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 1995 11:47:55 UTC