- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:25:57 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: www-html-editor@w3.org
On 01/03/2011 05:28 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > My recommendation is that you use the versions at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD - these versions work and will be maintained. There shouldn't even be a version in TR space. I thought I had ripped those out for the new release. Your comment may be read two ways: 1. use the version of the "xhtml-datatypes-1.mod" module in /MarkUp/DTD. I incorrectly referred to /TR/Markup/xhtml-datatypes-1.mod (which does not even exist) in my message, that was a typo, sorry for the confusion. The suggested correction does use the version in /MarkUp/DTD, indeed. 2. use the versions of the XHTML 1.1 and XHTML Basic 1.1 DTDs that appear in /MarkUp/DTD. That's not really possible since the DOCTYPE listed in the conformance section of these specs refers to, e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd for XHTML Basic 1.1. A validating XML parser would de facto use that URI to retrieve the DTDs. Francois. > > On 12/13/2010 11:29 AM, Francois Daoust wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The XHTML Basic 1.1 [1] and XHTML 1.1 [2] DTDs were recently published with a link to the "xhtml-datatypes-1.mod" module. This module is defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/Markup/xhtml-datatypes-1.mod but the link that appears in the DTDs targets the folder in which the DTD is defined, resulting in a broken link. >> >> >> Extract from one of the DTD (same problem in both): >> == >> <!ENTITY % xhtml-datatypes.mod >> PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES XHTML Datatypes 1.0//EN" >> "xhtml-datatypes-1.mod" > >> == >> >> >> Corrected extract: >> == >> <!ENTITY % xhtml-datatypes.mod >> PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES XHTML Datatypes 1.0//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-datatypes-1.mod" > >> == >> >> >> Thanks, >> Francois. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/DTD/xhtml-basic11.dtd >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd >
Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 17:26:26 UTC