- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:39:26 -0500
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 15:35 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote: > Dan, > > Thanks. This is now fixed. I'm interested to see how it's fixed. Is there an editor's draft or something I can look at? > Steven > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:25:53 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > A comment on > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-role-20061113 > > > > Please clarify how QNames in the role attribute are mapped to URIs. > > > > Maybe it's already there and I'm just reading too fast? In any > > case, for motivation, the March 2004 TAG finding, which concludes... > > > > "Where there is a compelling reason to use QNames instead of URIs for > > identification, it is imperative that specifications provide a mapping > > between QNames and URIs, if such a mapping is possible." > > -- Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in XML Content > > TAG Finding 17 March 2004 > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:39:12 UTC