- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:35:45 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, www-html-editor@w3.org
- Cc: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
Dan, Thanks. This is now fixed. Steven On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:25:53 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > A comment on > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-role-20061113 > > Please clarify how QNames in the role attribute are mapped to URIs. > > Maybe it's already there and I'm just reading too fast? In any > case, for motivation, the March 2004 TAG finding, which concludes... > > "Where there is a compelling reason to use QNames instead of URIs for > identification, it is imperative that specifications provide a mapping > between QNames and URIs, if such a mapping is possible." > -- Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in XML Content > TAG Finding 17 March 2004 > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:35:53 UTC