- From: Shane McCarron <xhtml2-issues@hades.mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:57:39 -0600 (CST)
- To: jim@jibbering.com
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
Jim, The phrase we try to use throughout the specification is "resource is unavailable" or "unavailable resource". We have updated this section to use that phrase. We have also added a definition of the term unavailable resource for clarity. > Dear HTML Working Group, > > What does "not presentable" mean in the following sentence of 19.1 > > "Like the object element, this element's content is only presented if the > referenced resource is not presentable." > > Please clarify this to say exactly what cases an image may be not > presentable, for example: > > <img src="chicken" type="text/ecmascript">Fallback!</img> > > A javascript resource has no presentation, so is not presentable, therefore > the fallback should be used, or not? > > Please specify this in a manner identical to other fallback behaviour in > Section 17, although please ensure this is clarified first. > > Regards, > > Jim Ley > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 16:51:49 UTC