- From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:42:14 -0400
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
- Cc: xp@pwg.org
> From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivonen@iki.fi] ... > It is said that if a "charset" parameter is present for the > application/xhtml+xml MIME type, the only valid value is "utf-8". It > would make sense to allow "utf-16" as well. All XML processors are > required to support UTF-16 in addition to UTF-8, so allowing > UTF-16 for XHTML-Print doesn't cause any additional burden > to implementations. Also, the payload of > Application/Vnd.pwg-multiplexed chunks is defined > as octets, so UTF-16 strings can be delivered as > Application/Vnd.pwg-multiplexed chunks without any further encoding. > I tend to agree with Henri when he says that support UTF-16 would not be much more expensive than UTF-8. Does anyone on this list or the PWG's XHTML-Print list disagree? Jim
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:42:25 UTC