- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 08:21:20 -0400
- To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: "Shane P. McCarron" <shane@themacs.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org, dsr@w3.org
Steven Pemberton wrote: > > > I guess the first issue here for me is: Does the new HTML WG > > wish to assume the persistent activities of the former WG, including > > errata management and translation requests/offers? If so, > > I have always taken the position that we would do that, since HTML 4 > is our starting point, and everything that changes in 4 has an effect > on 5; therefore it seems better that we be involved in the process, > and therefore that we do it. > > On the other hand I didn't realise you rereleased 4.0. I thought that > the 4.0 report was cast in stone, and that errata and interpretations > were released as separate documents (that's what we're doing for CSS > isn't it?). We rereleased the spec with no technical changes, just minor corrections (there were a bundle of them). The rerelease date is shown on the TR page [1]. We'll probably do the same for CSS when there are too many errata for us to be comfortable. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Received on Friday, 2 October 1998 08:22:04 UTC