- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 12:56:56 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: "Shane P. McCarron" <shane@themacs.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org, dsr@w3.org
> I guess the first issue here for me is: Does the new HTML WG > wish to assume the persistent activities of the former WG, including > errata management and translation requests/offers? If so, I have always taken the position that we would do that, since HTML 4 is our starting point, and everything that changes in 4 has an effect on 5; therefore it seems better that we be involved in the process, and therefore that we do it. On the other hand I didn't realise you rereleased 4.0. I thought that the 4.0 report was cast in stone, and that errata and interpretations were released as separate documents (that's what we're doing for CSS isn't it?). Steven
Received on Friday, 2 October 1998 06:57:18 UTC