- From: Ed Boraas <ecxjo@esperanto.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 1997 15:49:46 -0700
- To: <www-html-editor@w3.org>
>From http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40/struct/dirlang.html subsection "interpretation of language codes": >For artificial languages such as Elfish or Klingon, it would make sense to use the lang attribute to indicate >the change from the language of the enclosing context. Until the successor to [RFC1766] defines a standard way >to do this, one possibility is to use the x- prefix convention, e.g. x-elfish. it is worth noting that planned languages which are used as international auxilliary languages (which are sometimes referred to as "artificial"), such as esperanto, are already defined with 2-letter codes in the iso639 standard (see "http://www.sil.org/sgml/iso639a.html"). instructing website owners to use "x-esperanto" instead of simply "eo" would not be helpful in the identification process. possibly an addendum to this paragraph stating "However, many international auxilliary languages already have 2-letter codes. Please refer to http://www.sil.org/sgml/iso639a.html for further information." or something similar would be helpful. additionally, i was wondering whether or not there is support for &charactername; type conventions for extended latin, for instance the esperanto characters ĉ, ĝ, ĥ, ĵ, ŝ and ŭ which correspond to ISO10646/Unicode characters 264/265 (capital/lower case), 284/5, 292/3, 308/9, 348/9, 364/5, respectively. esperanto is gaining an incredible percentage of the non-english language pages available today. thank you for your time. if you have any comments or questions for me, please feel free to write. -ed boraas mork@vcn.bc.ca
Received on Saturday, 12 July 1997 18:48:36 UTC