- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:13:40 -0700
- To: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com>
- Cc: e-letter <inpost@gmail.com>, Swithun Crowe <swithun@swithun.servebeer.com>, www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF276B09F9.716D249A-ON8825779F.00638B0A-8825779F.00642242@ca.ibm.com>
In the case of Ubiquity XForms, there is a "users" group, though it is called a Developer group [1] , as opposed to a Contributor group [2]. Contributors to the open source project help to build the processor, and XForms Developers use the processor as part of the XForms-based applications they develop but do not contribute to the processor implementation. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-xforms [2] http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-xforms-eng Based on the misunderstanding, I've added "(user)" and "(users)" in key places to clear it up. Cheers, John Boyer From: Leigh L Klotz Jr <leigh.klotz@xerox.com> To: e-letter <inpost@gmail.com> Cc: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA, Swithun Crowe <swithun@swithun.servebeer.com>, www-forms@w3.org Date: 09/15/2010 11:02 AM Subject: Re: invalid binding expression error On 09/15/2010 02:00 AM, e-letter wrote: May I suggest better explanation of the purpose of the mailing list is published. I will continue in another resource elsewhere; thanks to all. At the Forms WG meeting today, we discussed this topic, and will be following through with your suggestion to clarify the mailing list purpose. Personally, I suspect that many discussions will continue to start here, simply because this list is quite visible, but we will probably encourage some discussions to move to other places once the people involved get a clearer idea of what resources are available for their problem. Language design issues will remain here, but in particular, we'd like to encourage bug reports and support requests for particular processors to take place on the vendor's resource pages. Here's a quick rundown of some places to go for processor-specific XForms help (alphabetical). Not all processors are listed; in particular, I've omitted those without an easily-found mailing list. There are many more implementations listed at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_Implementations ---> Implementors, please feel free to respond with your support lists here. We will collect the information and make it available. <--- betterFORM http://www.betterform.de/jsp/forms.jsp EMC Formula https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-4345 https://community.emc.com/community/edn/xmltech?view=discussions FormFaces https://sourceforge.net/projects/formfaces/support Mozilla XForms Extension https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-xforms Orbeon XForms http://www.orbeon.com/forms/community PicoForms http://www.picoforms.com/wiki/index.php?title=PicoForms_wiki:Community_portal IBM Lotus Forms http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Lotus/Lotus_Forms https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/products/forms/ Ubiquity XForms http://code.google.com/p/ubiquity-xforms/ Doesn't mention a users group yet, but I suspect they'll have one soon. XForms WikiBook http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/XForms XSLTForms https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support Leigh.
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 18:14:31 UTC