- From: Ronald van Kuijk <rvkuijk@intercommit.nl>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:07:47 +0200
- To: e-letter <inpost@gmail.com>
- CC: www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4C7CE283.5060604@intercommit.nl>
Op 31-08-10 12:53, e-letter schreef: > On 31/08/2010, Ronald van Kuijk<rvkuijk@intercommit.nl> wrote: >> In betterForm I get this error (after switching ' to " and vice-versa) >> >> xforms-binding-exception: property 'relevant' already present at model item >> *URL: *http://127.0.0.1:8080/betterform-trunk/forms/e-letter.xhtml >> *Element causing Exception:*/html[1]/head[1]/xf:model[1]/xf:bind[2] >> * >> *This is not allowed according to the spec and an error should be >> thrown... Personally I always have 2 different XForms processors >> (BetterFORM and Orbeon, but I always use the former) that I use to >> check if I'm wrong or the engine. >> >> So if Mozilla XForms does not complain, it is in violation of the spec >> (see point 2 in http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#evt-rebuild) >> >> It can be solved by changing it to one bind: >> >> <xf:bind nodeset="stage" relevant="../purpose='ewbrl' or >> ../purpose='nibrf'" /> >> > This does not work so perhaps there is (another) bug with mozilla > xforms plug-in. If you know of another cross-platform web browser I > could use to test xforms please tell me, thank you. There is no other cross platform browser that supports xforms (natively). Lots of other implementations can be found on http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_Implementations. Some are fully client side (personally I'd not recommend those, not because their quality would be bad (I have no opinion) , but just that I do not trust anything that just runs in th browser) or client-server combinations. As mentioned before, I develop in betterFORM and if I encounter an issue (behaviour I do not expect) I also test in Orbeon. With these you can have XForms in *all* browsers. Ronald
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 11:08:19 UTC