- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:48:17 -0800
- To: Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF57638311.8C55914C-ON88257403.0077A63E-88257403.0077C7C4@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Aaron, I'd like to see the thing which doesn't work. One does not have direct tree comparison capabilities, regardless of event order, and it doesn't seem to matter much because the subtrees will often be keyed by the value of a particular element in the subtree anyway... Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org 03/05/2008 09:00 AM To www-forms@w3.org cc Subject Re: what should happen when a xf:insert is inside a xforms-select handler? Hey John, > Realizing that the above may not win the convenience award, it would, > for anyone who responded to the call for expression of need, cause me to > ask: what specifically are you trying to do that you can't do? > Your workaround will work for cases where the xf:item contains xf:value elements. But I do not believe that the workaround is possible should the xf:itemset contain a xf:copy element unless there is an xpath function that I'm unaware of (a distinct possibility) to determine node tree equality. I guess it is possible using JS, though (on Firefox, at least). --Aaron
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 21:48:44 UTC