- From: <Kirk.Johnson@zootweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:41:36 -0700
- To: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-request@w3.org
www-forms-request@w3.org wrote on 02/02/2007 04:06:23 AM: > I agree, however, that the aim should be to allow the designer to choose > and specify the location, if possible. I agree that choice would be best, but mostly to accomodate cultural differences in a shrinking world. I don't want to come off as holier-than-thou on this design convention. I freely confess: in my past, I have located labels on three of the four compass points around a checkbox - but never (cringe!) *under* a checkbox ;) And we are talking about a *convention* here, not a *commandment* handed down from on high. The fact that I have located boolean labels other than on the right doesn't make it a good idea, though, as *logical* as it might have seemed at the time. Many of us programmers place too much weight on logic in our UI designs, when a little more attention to convention would better serve our users. I'm trying to reform now :) Again, I invite you all to try to find even a *single* example, in commercial grade software, of a boolean label other than on the right. Not even Lotus Notes violates this design convention (it is probably the only design convention Notes doesn't violate). I'll be direct: I will not use any tool that makes it difficult to implement long-established, widely-held design conventions. This is a showstopper for me, personally. Yes, I am serious. I am sure the XForms working group has bigger fish to fry than this. I understand the notion of priorites. I do hope this is put on the to-do list to be addressed someday, though. Happy Friday, to all who reside in a culture where that is a happy thing :) Back to lurking, Kirk
Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 16:42:06 UTC