- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:06:21 -0700
- To: "Allan Beaufour" <beaufour@gmail.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Xerox is presently using Chiba in our product DocuShare CPX 5.0 [1]. We use the Chiba Web AJAX implementation of XForms [2] for providing dynamic pages, and the Chiba HTML 4.01 mode for a fully-accessible version of the same pages. We use XForms for edit and add data screens for certain features, where we have a need to bind to XML data, or where we have a need for dynamic forms. Some of our XForms pages are hand authored, and others are generated via templates. Using Chiba as a server side technology has worked well for us to provide the access to the dynamic forms and to XML bindings with a minimum of problems for accessibility, and without having to write any additional JavaScript for our product. Of course, we'd like it to be faster and have fewer bad interactions with things like the back button, but our hope is that Chiba and other XForms products will improve over time. Finally we are hoping that the WAI Dynamic Pages Roadmap [3] makes good on its promise to describe XForms as an accessibility mechanism itself. Then perhaps screen reader vendors such as IBM will take notice and provide the tools necessary, and Bobby and other validation agents will certify XForms as accessible. Success in this area is a legal pre-requesite for adoption into many products, and it is critically important XForms gets these implementations made available. We also use XForms in other areas in Xerox, and I will be sure to point them out when I can. [1] http://docushare.xerox.com/ [2] http://chibacon.de [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/ Leigh. -----Original Message----- From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Allan Beaufour Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:25 AM To: www-forms@w3.org Subject: Deploying (accessible) XForms today? Since not everybody is using a browser with XForms capabilities, if you want to deploy XForms today, server-side transformations might be needed. But how about accessibility? I fear that you loose that then? /me steps aside and hopes for some good answers from the server-side crowd :) -- ... Allan
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 18:07:12 UTC