- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:27:03 +0100
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "Rogelio Pérez Cano" <rogeliop@satec.es>, www-forms@w3.org
Steven, I think Rogelio's question is whether it should *still* execute, even with a handler attribute on it. It's a good question, and not one I've seen raised before. My first reaction is to say that for conformance reasons it would be more straightforward if both messages were invoked. Any thoughts? Mark On 31/07/06, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:59:15 +0200, Rogelio Pérez Cano <rogeliop@satec.es> > wrote: > > > In the previous example replacing the first <action> element with a > > <message>: > .... > > I think the first message shouldn´t be triggered because it doesn´t work > > as > > a handler, but I´m not pretty sure, what do you think? > > <message> is listed in the actions chapter. Since it is an action, it can > be used as a handler: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/slice10.html#id151156 > > Best wishes, > > Steven > > > > -- Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 10:27:20 UTC