- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:57:15 -0700
- To: monterro2004@tiscali.co.uk
- Cc: raman@google.com, www-forms@w3.org
I suggest that we create a Wiki or other online document that collects together implementations of features like AVTs --- this is the quickest and most effective means of laying endless arguments about whether something is implementable or useful to rest. Francisco Monteiro writes: > Raman, > > For what it's worth, facileXforms also implements AVTs in places like > xf:submission/@action, @instance now, and in all extension controls. > > Francisco > -----Original Message----- > From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of T.V Raman > Sent: 25 August 2006 00:14 > To: ebruchez@orbeon.com > Cc: www-forms@w3.org > Subject: Re: url params et al > > > > Great! > > This is even more implementation evidence that AVTs are A) useful, and B) > implementable and C) tractable. I suggest that all the implementors who have > built it so far write down details of what works in the form of spec ready > text so that later implementations know what to do to stay interoperable. > > Erik Bruchez writes: > > > > Raman, > > > > For what it's worth, Orbeon PresentationServer also implements AVTs in > > places like xf:submission/@action now, and we plan tot support them in > > the host language as well (some code is already in place) :-) > > -Erik > > > T.V Raman wrote: > > > > > > Oh Great! > > > > > > This is the first time I'm hearing about an AVT implementation in > > > the context of XForms --cudos to you for doing this! > > > > > > Now, Mark Birbeck -- your turn -- implement AVT in FormsPlayer > > --- > and if Aaron can implement it in Firefox we'll be done. > > > > > > Joern Turner writes: > > > > > > > > T.V Raman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well, for the client or server agnostic solution, same > > > > > three-letter incantation -- AVT > > > > > > that's the other variant > Chiba supports. So the following expression > > > will also work > > > > > > > <xf:submission action="http://somehost/{/data/nextUrl}" .../> > > > > > > > provides that there's a default instance like this: > > > > <xf:instance xmlns=""> > > > > <data> > > > > <nextUrl>somepage.html</nextUrl> > > > > </data> > > > > </xf:instance> > > > > > > > > Joern > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Birbeck writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, > > > > > > > > > > > > Glad that works for you...but that's a server-side solution, so > it > > > > > falls into the first category I outlined, such as ASP, JSP, > PHP, etc. > > > > > > Chiba is doing the substitution for you. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying this isn't useful, just that I'd like to see a > solution > > > > > where you could do this even if you were running a > form locally on > > > > > your machine, with no server. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 24/08/06, Jason <jeacott@hardlight.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > argh -next time I'll read the doco first! > > > > > > > I'm using Chiba and it already has a way of handling this > very much > > > > > > along the lines described by Mark. DOH! > > > > > > > -if you are interested in their resolution its described in > the chiba > > > > > > cookbook, or the short version in the chiba FAQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks again to all that helped - I'll now be > using the chiba specific > > > > > > solution just because in this case > its very simple and unobtrusive. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "specifiy a parameter on the GET string calling the form. > This parameter > > > > > > say 'foo' may then be used on the URI-string > such as <submission > > > > > > action="http://yourhost/{foo}" .../>. The > value of 'foo' will be > > > > > > substituted for the expression {foo} > then. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *note there are more elaborate mechanisms for handling > arbitrary numbers > > > > > > of named params, potentially (I think) from > multiple sources. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > Jason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Klotz, Leigh wrote: > > > > > > > > I think this processing rightfully belongs on the server, > as the URI > > > > > > > specifies the resource, and the server is > responsible for providing you > > > > > > > the resource. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what XForms processor you're using, but in > browsers that > > > > > > > support JavaScript handlers, you can ask the > browser what the page URI > > > > > > > was (via the location property). > > > > > > > > Leigh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: > www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Jason > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:46 PM > > > > > > > > To: www-forms@w3.org > > > > > > > Subject: url params et > al > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all -I think I'm > going quietly mad. I have a small problem that I > > > > > > > haven't > had to deal with via xforms before (I think) and cant seem to > > > > > > > > see the solution - it must be easy, I'm sure of it. > > > > > > > > I need to launch an xform with a given data id passed as an > url > > > > > > > parameter (the url will come from an email). eg: > > > > > > > > http://.../somexform?id=abcd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the form then needs to load data with id=abcd (or at least something > > > > > > > > derived from it). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my question is how can I do this without dynamically > modifying the xform > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself each time. I > dont really want to store the id in a session > > > > > > > variable and > have the form retrieve it on form-ready, I'd like to know > > > > > > > > if its possible with a pure xform, or at least a nicer approach to this > > > > > > > > one. This would be trivial if the initial request was via the > xform, but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do you preset a forms' > state for startup without having the form > > > > > > > request the info > itself? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any thoughts? I think my head must be full of cotton wool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > Jason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mark Birbeck > > > > > > CEO > > > > > > x-port.net Ltd. > > > > > > > > > > > > e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net > > > > > > t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 > > > > > > w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ > > > > > b: > http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Download our XForms processor from > > > > > > http://www.formsPlayer.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Orbeon - > XForms Everywhere: > > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ > > -- > Best Regards, > --raman > > Title: Research Scientist > Email: raman@google.com > WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ > GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com > PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc > Google: tv+raman > -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google: tv+raman
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 14:58:02 UTC