- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:57:15 -0700
- To: monterro2004@tiscali.co.uk
- Cc: raman@google.com, www-forms@w3.org
I suggest that we create a Wiki or other online document that
collects together implementations of features like AVTs --- this
is the quickest and most effective means of laying endless
arguments about whether something is implementable or useful to
rest.
Francisco Monteiro writes:
> Raman,
>
> For what it's worth, facileXforms also implements AVTs in places like
> xf:submission/@action, @instance now, and in all extension controls.
>
> Francisco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of T.V Raman
> Sent: 25 August 2006 00:14
> To: ebruchez@orbeon.com
> Cc: www-forms@w3.org
> Subject: Re: url params et al
>
>
>
> Great!
>
> This is even more implementation evidence that AVTs are A) useful, and B)
> implementable and C) tractable. I suggest that all the implementors who have
> built it so far write down details of what works in the form of spec ready
> text so that later implementations know what to do to stay interoperable.
>
> Erik Bruchez writes:
> >
> > Raman,
> >
> > For what it's worth, Orbeon PresentationServer also implements AVTs in >
> places like xf:submission/@action now, and we plan tot support them in >
> the host language as well (some code is already in place) :-) > > -Erik >
> > T.V Raman wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh Great!
> > >
> > > This is the first time I'm hearing about an AVT implementation in > >
> the context of XForms --cudos to you for doing this!
> > >
> > > Now, Mark Birbeck -- your turn -- implement AVT in FormsPlayer > > ---
> and if Aaron can implement it in Firefox we'll be done.
> > >
> > > Joern Turner writes:
> > > >
> > > > T.V Raman wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, for the client or server agnostic solution, same > > > >
> three-letter incantation -- AVT > > > > > > that's the other variant
> Chiba supports. So the following expression > > > will also work > > >
> > > > <xf:submission action="http://somehost/{/data/nextUrl}" .../> > > >
> > > > provides that there's a default instance like this:
> > > > <xf:instance xmlns="">
> > > > <data>
> > > > <nextUrl>somepage.html</nextUrl>
> > > > </data>
> > > > </xf:instance>
> > > >
> > > > Joern
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark Birbeck writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jason,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glad that works for you...but that's a server-side solution, so
> it > > > > > falls into the first category I outlined, such as ASP, JSP,
> PHP, etc.
> > > > > > Chiba is doing the substitution for you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not saying this isn't useful, just that I'd like to see a
> solution > > > > > where you could do this even if you were running a
> form locally on > > > > > your machine, with no server.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 24/08/06, Jason <jeacott@hardlight.com.au> wrote:
> > > > > > > argh -next time I'll read the doco first!
> > > > > > > I'm using Chiba and it already has a way of handling this
> very much > > > > > > along the lines described by Mark. DOH!
> > > > > > > -if you are interested in their resolution its described in
> the chiba > > > > > > cookbook, or the short version in the chiba FAQ >
> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks again to all that helped - I'll now be
> using the chiba specific > > > > > > solution just because in this case
> its very simple and unobtrusive.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "specifiy a parameter on the GET string calling the form.
> This parameter > > > > > > say 'foo' may then be used on the URI-string
> such as <submission > > > > > > action="http://yourhost/{foo}" .../>. The
> value of 'foo' will be > > > > > > substituted for the expression {foo}
> then. "
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *note there are more elaborate mechanisms for handling
> arbitrary numbers > > > > > > of named params, potentially (I think) from
> multiple sources.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Jason.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> > > > > > > > I think this processing rightfully belongs on the server,
> as the URI > > > > > > > specifies the resource, and the server is
> responsible for providing you > > > > > > > the resource.
> > > > > > > > I'm not sure what XForms processor you're using, but in
> browsers that > > > > > > > support JavaScript handlers, you can ask the
> browser what the page URI > > > > > > > was (via the location property).
> > > > > > > > Leigh.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From:
> www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On > > > > > >
> > Behalf Of Jason > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:46 PM
> > > > > > > > To: www-forms@w3.org > > > > > > > Subject: url params et
> al > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all -I think I'm
> going quietly mad. I have a small problem that I > > > > > > > haven't
> had to deal with via xforms before (I think) and cant seem to > > > > > >
> > see the solution - it must be easy, I'm sure of it.
> > > > > > > > I need to launch an xform with a given data id passed as an
> url > > > > > > > parameter (the url will come from an email). eg:
> > > > > > > > http://.../somexform?id=abcd > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > the form then needs to load data with id=abcd (or at least something >
> > > > > > > derived from it).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > my question is how can I do this without dynamically
> modifying the xform > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself each time. I
> dont really want to store the id in a session > > > > > > > variable and
> have the form retrieve it on form-ready, I'd like to know > > > > > > >
> if its possible with a pure xform, or at least a nicer approach to this > >
> > > > > > one. This would be trivial if the initial request was via the
> xform, but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how do you preset a forms'
> state for startup without having the form > > > > > > > request the info
> itself?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > any thoughts? I think my head must be full of cotton wool.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > > > Jason.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Mark Birbeck
> > > > > > CEO
> > > > > > x-port.net Ltd.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
> > > > > > t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
> > > > > > w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ > > > > > b:
> http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Download our XForms processor from > > > > >
> http://www.formsPlayer.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Orbeon -
> XForms Everywhere:
> > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> --raman
>
> Title: Research Scientist
> Email: raman@google.com
> WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
> GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
> PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
> Google: tv+raman
>
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Title: Research Scientist
Email: raman@google.com
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 14:58:02 UTC