- From: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <u.n.l@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:25:55 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, www-forms@w3.org
John,
please include <xf:dispatch/> too. And - just for completeness - don't
forget the precedence stuff (bindings ruling out static attributes ?).
However, I don't like the sub-markup approach that much. I'd prefer a
@value attribute.
Regards,
Uli.
John Boyer wrote:
>
> I generally like the type of approach Eric describes in which we use a
> sub-element with a value attribute, where the subelement takes the same
> name as the attribute it controls.
>
> I like it better than ATVs because ATVs open a Pandora's box of
> processing questions, whereas the subelement/@value idea allows us to
> add functionality precisely where it's needed in a way that is easy for
> form authors to grasp and for design environments to recognize.
>
> In this case, though, my proposal on today's telecon was to do a
> spec-ready version of the more specific solution I posted earlier to
> this list, which was to make available a subelement/@value solution for
> setting the case of a toggle action and the control of a setfocus, e.g.
>
> <toggle>
> <case value="concat('case-', some/node)"/>
> </toggle>
>
> <setfocus>
> <control value="concat('control-', some/node)"/>
> </setfocus>
>
> Based on having received the action item to do so on today's telecon, I
> will be making that spec-ready text available to the WG shortly, but the
> solution is so easy that I would not be surprised to see implementer
> feedback even before I finish the formal spec work! Partly because
> XForms just needs to be able to do this (whereas there's a whole
> Pandora's box of issues that this solution happily avoids).
>
> Best regards,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist
> Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>
>
>
>
> *Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>*
> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org
>
> 08/16/2006 11:34 AM
>
>
> To
> www-forms@w3.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Can toggle@case or case@selected be calculated?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> > Two issues come to mind:
> > 1. Currently @selected it's defined as an xsd:boolean (an enumeration
> of the strings "true", "false", "1", and "0".
> > Unfortunately, "true" isn't an XPath expression that evaluates to
> "true"; that would have to be "true()", so there's not the smooth
> upgrade path that it seems like there might be.
>
> One possible direction, syntactically, would be to use a nested element,
> as we may do for xforms:submission in 1.1. E.g.:
>
> <xforms:case>
> <xforms:selected value="instance('my-instance')/my-value = 3"/>
> ...
>
> or something like this. Ideally I would prefer attribute value templates
> (post-1.1)but as you point out there is a discrepancy between 'true'
> and true().
>
> -Erik
>
> --
> Orbeon - XForms Everywhere:
> http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
>
>
--
Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 11:26:16 UTC