- From: T. V. Raman <raman@users.sf.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:18:25 -0800
- To: Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
At the level at which the presence WAI tools check for accessibility, an XForms document that does things per spec, i.e. use labels etc according to the XForms Schema, is probably way ahead than anything that passes a conformance check designed against the older forms design. That said, I do not believe there is any "WAI" checker, or for that matter, any 508 Guidelines that have been published against the XForms spec. >>>>> "Klotz," == Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> writes: Klotz,> I would be interested in hearing from any vendors who Klotz,> have XForms processors for the WAI community. Klotz,> Klotz,> Also, does anyone know of tools to validate XForms Klotz,> for Sec 508 and WAI profiles? Klotz,> Klotz,> A quick scan of WAI Tools [1] did not show any. Klotz,> XForms is presently not listed on WAI Conformance [2] Klotz,> but it is in the DHTML Roadmap [3]. Klotz,> Klotz,> Some tools, such as Cynthia, certify XHTML+XForms Klotz,> pages as accessible, but report that they have no Klotz,> input elements, so I don't think they're actually Klotz,> checking. Klotz,> Klotz,> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/existingtools.html [2] Klotz,> http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/conformance.html [3] Klotz,> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/DHTMLRoadmap110505.html Klotz,> Klotz,> Leigh. -- Best Regards, --raman Email: raman@users.sf.net WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ AIM: emacspeak GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google: tv+raman
Received on Friday, 11 November 2005 04:58:38 UTC