Re: AJAX vs. Xforms

Victor Engmark wrote:

>Dunno if you'd consider a >800 lines XForms document "insanely basic",
>but it's client-side
>  
>
No, I wouldn't.  I was more or less referring to HTML forms, which 
XForms was originally designed to replace (though I can tell the plan is 
to take them farther than HTML forms).

If you're referring to using XForms outside of a WWW setting, without 
XHTML, then I imagine the debate between what should be client and 
server-side will get larger and more complicated.  I was referring to 
WWW XHTML, where at this point it's for the most part obvious what will 
go where.

-- 
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/ - Reclaim Your Inbox!

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 23:22:08 UTC