- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:18:03 +0100
- To: "Goodrich, Christopher Michael" <cmgoodr@sandia.gov>
- CC: www-forms@w3.org
Goodrich, Christopher Michael wrote: > I was referring to the inclusion of HTML in Xforms, not the inclusion > of Xforms in HTML. That inclusion implies that there should be some > standard for forming the tag that has been included. My assumption > would be that including any tag that derived it's base from HTML > would have to conform to an XHMTL standard since both are under the > general umbrella of XML. Oh ok. Sure. You still can't validate it though, without some profile that defines it. > Absolutely, however, we again run into the question of which standard > to use. HTML is so loose that the inclusion of an ALT attribute is > not necessary to display properly, and only by social acceptance does > it ever get included. But the HTML standard does require it, since HTML 2.0. Actually, HTML 4.01 is almost exactly equivalent to XHTML 1.0 with regard to semantics. > XHTML on the other hand requires the ALT attribute to be present in > order to conform to the standard and be validated as proper code. > So, I believe that this application of the button needs to be > properly formed in XHMLT to be validated and that is why he's getting > the error about validation. You can't just mix elements from different namespaces and get the document to validate. I'm not sure if I followed everything correctly what has been discussed, but if it really is about validation you would need to define that xforms:label allows xhtml:img in some DTD or schema. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 19:18:14 UTC