- From: Goodrich, Christopher Michael <cmgoodr@sandia.gov>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:26:26 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- cc: www-forms@w3.org
Ideal --- If we have a web browser that's xforms compatible. When is Firefox going to go mainstream with this again? Thank you, Christopher M Goodrich A+ Corporate Computing Help Desk Sandia National Laboratories Science Applications International Corporation cmgoodr@sandia.gov (505) 284-4797 -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:22 AM To: Goodrich, Christopher Michael Cc: www-forms@w3.org Subject: RE: XForms Myths Exposed - By Ian Hixie (Opera) On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Goodrich, Christopher Michael wrote: > > So can anyone explain if these myths seem to bring my hopes crashing > down, or whether I should just hang on? None of the "myths" I listed on my blog are reasons not to use XForms. XForms sounds like it would be ideal for your use case. My post (which was forwarded to this list without my request) was merely trying to correct some statements that I have heard made about XForms and HTML forms -- it was not trying to put down XForms in any way. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 15:27:06 UTC