- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:41:03 -0800
- To: "'www-forms@w3c.org'" <www-forms@w3c.org>
Just as <group /> can be used as a container, so can <bind />.
I believe that <bind /> is legal and useful, just like <group />, and want
to make sure that implementations aren't tripped up on the base case.
The containership of bind is useful, as XML Include [1] requires a container
element: the inclusion is an InfoSet, not a document fragment.
Example:
<model xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms">
<instance src="foo-instance.xml" />
<xi:include href="foo-bindings.xml" />
</model>
File foo-bindings.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<bind xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms">
<bind nodeset="foo" relevant="true()" />
<bind nodeset="bar" relevant="false()" />
</bind>
Does anybody disagree with <bind />, or find another problem with this
mechamism for using XInclude?
Leigh.
-----
[1] XML Inclusions (XInclude) Version 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2004 17:37:46 UTC