- From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@yahoo.ca>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:28:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-forms@w3.org
> You may innovate as much as you like, but then just > don't call it W3C XForms. Fair enough. How about XForms 2.0 or XForms NG? After all 1.0 versions never really catch on, do they? > You should, for instance, download X-Smiles 0.71 > and take a close look at the XForms examples: > http://www.x-smiles.org/download.html. > There is already significant XForms content out > there. Well, I wouldn't call a single academic research prototype site significant content. Please, also remember that academics hardly ever rock the boat (that is, challenge your XForms spec). > You clearly didn't understand the spec. That's ok. > The spec is the result of an endless array of review > cycles, and targetted towards implementers. See that's my point. Specs rarely work if the leads don't "eat their own dogfood", that is, build a working prototype themselves. Take Tim Berners-Lee, the founding-fahter of the Web, as an example. He built its own HTML browser. But so far I haven't seen anything like an "official" W3C XForms prototype from any of the spec leads? You might wonna read up on the history of HTML and look into Tim Berners-Lee book titled: "Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web" > The spec > itself may be too complex for you, but XForms 1.0, > the language and architecture, is not complex. See, you lost touch with reality in "endless review cycles". You need to get out some XForms browsers/engines and than listen to users as the struggle with XForms. It will open your eyes. > So far, you did not inspire us. Well, don't worry I won't run away and I will lead by example. > You have been inspired > by XForms 1.0, which is part of our job, as we are > in charge for the Web and are on a mission to lead > the Web to its full > potential, whereby inspiring others is an important > aspect. Well, I would say its a two way street and also having a single committee in charge of the Web is worrysome as it likely will lead to something like the Academie Francaise who is in charge of the French language so that it can reach its full potential. As a case study you might wonna read up on the evolution of the English language. A good start is Bill Bryson's book entitled "The Mother Tongue: English And How It Got That Way". - Gerald ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 14:28:09 UTC