- From: Hemant Desai <Hemant.Desai@patni.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:05:32 +0530
- To: <www-forms@w3.org>
There was a discussion going on abt what the implementation should be and I am personally in favour of the Browser implementation..(Server side spewing's definitely something which I thing we have to evelove out of ...HTML has served its purpose long enough and its time to move on.. Hemant Desai "Vic Cekvenich" <vc@basebeans.com> wrote in message news:b76eha$2u8$1@localhost.localdomain... > > Sounds like practical things to do. > > Would Mozilla group be able to change the game by having xhtml and xforms? > > .V > > Gerald Bauer wrote: > > Thanks for all the positive comments. > > > > I think everyone agrees that having a standard that > > lets you easily build forms in XML sporting "XML in, > > XML out" is what everyone longs for (except, of > > course, some industry giants such as Microsoft, Adobe, > > IBM, and so on pushing their own ware). > > > > > >>Um, IBM has just released an XForms prototype. And > >>Oracle has one in the pipeline too, I understand. > > > > > > Well, it's one thing to throw together a server-side > > tag lib that spits out HTML, it's another to build a > > rich browser with built-in XForms support challenging > > Internet Explorer. > > > > Doesn't Microsoft's HTML "containment" strategy work > > like a charm? Browser innovation practically halted > > since Internet Explorer has taken over the market. > > > > > >>Some specific examples would go a long way to > >>understanding what you consider good and bad in > >>XForms. > > > > > > As I said I don't claim to have all the answers and > > I invite everybody to innovate and feel free to > > clean-up the XForms spec and add whatever they need to > > their own XForms 1.0 motors/engine/browsers. > > > > Again, once there are XForms motors/engines/browser > > you can play with, you will get "real" thoughts from > > "real" users and then the "real" XForms leaders can > > get togther and hammer out an interop spec (aka XForms > > 2.0 or whatever you wonna call it). > > > > As an example, just look a the forthcoming XForms > > book from Micah Dubinko, the XForms spec lead online @ > > http://dubinko.info/writing/xforms/book.html . Don't > > get me wrong I applaud his efforts. However, more two > > hundreds pages and with barely a single "real-world" > > example speaks for itself. > > > > For more details about my mini-XForms critique > > including examples, check out slide #16 from my "Rich > > Clients, Rich Browsers, Rich Portals" talk online @ > > http://vamphq.com/talk/vanx-mar-2003/slides.html#rich-16 > > > > More details about my XForms clean-up will be > > forthcoming as Luxor progesses, after all, Luxor is a > > free, open-source projects residing online @ > > http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net > > > > - Gerald > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > > > >
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 09:27:07 UTC