Re: XForms errors in documentation

I second that. There is an old saying that seems apropos: It would be better
to have him inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in.
;-}

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@origoservices.com>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:52 AM
Subject: XForms errors in documentation


>
> Here is a suggestion.
>
> In future, why not just give Andrew a copy of new drafts before release,
and let him do his proof reading first?
>
> He does seem to be quite good at it, and is very diligent.
>
> All the best
>
> Mark Seaborne
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com]
> > Sent: 13 November 2002 09:45
> > To: www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-editor@w3.org; Xforms@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [XForms] XForms CR - The diff-marking cannot be relied on
> >
> >
> > The existence of a diff-marked version of the XForms CR is
> > welcome. However,
> > unfortunately, anyone relying on diff-marking to identify all
> > changes in the
> > CR will be misled.
> >
> > For example, the contents which relate to 7.2 (and
> > subsections) have not been
> > diff-marked although new sections have been added.
> >
> > Similarly the subsections of the text of 7.2 includes new
> > sections which are
> > not diff-marked.
> >
> > I would caution those relying on diff-marking to identify for
> > them all
> > changes made in the CR that it is not safe to do so.
> >
> > Andrew Watt
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > XForms-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 07:41:04 UTC