- From: Rob Cooper <rob.cooper@coconsulting.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:17:11 +1100
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
- Cc: <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
- Message-ID: <5427E6CA0C4603498B63DA20BB1918400289CC@co1.coconsulting.com.au>
Andrew, As you have suggested I am extrapolating from the public discussion that has had an airing on this list. I have had no information that would suggest that Microsoft is working on or likely to work on an XForms implementation. As you know Microsoft are active in many of the XML related standards process, and their absence from the XForms process is notable - as is their development of a proprietary technology with almost the same purpose. Microsoft were initially active in the OASIS Web Services for Interactive Applications TC as well, but don't seem to be involved in that any more either. Regards, Rob -----Original Message----- From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com] Sent: Monday, 4 November 2002 6:56 PM To: Rob Cooper; www-forms@w3.org Cc: xforms@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: xforms processor In a message dated 03/11/2002 22:25:05 GMT Standard Time, rob.cooper@coconsulting.com.au writes: I'm in the process of building one on .NET in C#. I am working under the assumption that MS will not be doing so given their stance on XForms. Rob, Could you express what you think Microsoft's stance on XForms actually is? I don't recall hearing anything definitive. Are you extrapolating from public speculation about XDocs or are you thinking about something more specific? Thanks Andrew Watt
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 17:17:57 UTC