- From: Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 13:34:57 +0200
- To: tvraman@almaden.ibm.com
- CC: www-forms@w3.org
I don't mind that a number of things are passed to 2.0, especially if they have an important impact on the current state of affairs. That's simply not feasible in a last call stage. In the light of what is possible with current standard forms systems it is certainly acceptable to do it with this topic. It would still be a major leap. Werner. T. V. Raman wrote: > I probably do too to an extent. > > However, please understand that the XForms 1.0 design had to take the > middle ground between two extremes -- > do everything with XML Schema vs not use XML Schema at all. > > All said and done, we've > probably picked a decent middle ground (of course, this is an entirely > subjective opinion)-- > but at this point I think the real test is how much can be done with > the XForms 1.0 design --rather than what cannot be done. > > We need to get XForms 1.0 in real use in the hands of real users > before going the next mile > --this will also give us a good sense of what we need to address in > the 2.0 timeframe. > > what Werner Donné writes: > > > > Ryan, > > > > I understand your point and I agree. > > > > Regards, > > > > Werner. > > -- > > Werner Donné -- Re BVBA > > Engelbeekstraat 8 > > B-3300 Tienen > > tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be > -- Werner Donné -- Re BVBA Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: werner.donne@re.be
Received on Monday, 5 August 2002 07:34:47 UTC