- From: T. V. Raman <tvraman@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:36:02 -0700
- To: joern turner <joern.turner@web.de>
- Cc: tvraman@almaden.ibm.com, www-forms@w3.org
schema is to validate the instance. The XForms model consists of the instance and schema -- the instance you populate --the schema you use to validate against after the instance is populated. Reason I define above here is that in general hoping to asemble a rich xml tree by looking at the binding expressions is likely to be intractable. >>>>> "joern" == joern turner <joern.turner@web.de> writes: joern> Hello, before starting i should state that i'm joern> really welcome the work about the joern> repeat-element. this solves a contiuous and joern> repeating ;) problem especially in web joern> form-processing. joern> from my understanding of the draft, the structure joern> of the instance can be constructed without joern> referring to a schema - simply by extracting this joern> information out of the binding-expression used in joern> the XForms UI. if this is not right, some or all joern> of the following may be irrelevant. joern> T. V. Raman wrote: >> Hi -- you're correct in that there is no way to >> reassemble a list of items on the server because of >> how WWW form post works today. >> >> However there is nothing inside the specification for >> repeat that claims we preserve order --perhaps we >> should make it even clearer. joern> Yes, you're right. That was just an assumption i joern> silently made. But, would'nt the user expect to joern> get the data back in the order they have been joern> inputted? Wouldn't the notion of a 'document joern> order' as it is common in XML be destroyed? joern> second, -- assuming you have a list of lists in joern> your instance-data which you use as initial data joern> (presets) or a preloaded instance, it is not joern> possible to reconstruct this list in a submit joern> without the usage of positional predicates. The joern> result (again the example from the draft) would joern> simply be: joern> <items> <item> <f1>first</f1> <f2>first</fi> joern> <f1>second</f1> <f2>second</f2> <f1>third</f1> joern> <f2>third</f2> </item> </items> joern> which is clearly a different semantic. maybe i'm joern> on the wrong track here, but i'm using the joern> algorithm which is described for joern> instance-initialization: evaluating the binding joern> expression from left to right and creating joern> appropriate children for each step, if it does joern> not exist already. although the brilliant joern> simplicity of that algorithm would get joern> complicated by positions, i couldn't think of any joern> other way to preserve the input order which i (as joern> you might have guessed by now) consider essential joern> for the usefullness of repeat. otherwise i would joern> urge the application using the XForms processor joern> to achieve this some way - which may be joern> complicated. >> Incidentally I'm surprized you raised this in >> connection with repeat --and not selectMany --both >> have the same problem --only difference is that >> selectMany is populating a schema list --repeat is >> populating something with more substructure joern> not exactly. - a selectMany (in html e.g. mapped joern> to a <select multiple="true" ...) will be send as joern> a single parameter: with parameter-name and an joern> array of values. The selected values occur in the joern> order they're displayed in the list. - at least joern> when you're using the serlvet-api to parse joern> parameters. joern> please excuse my lengthy explanations but as i joern> can hardly think of an application which does not joern> rely on some kind of 'natural' order, this seems joern> to be an important topic to me. >> -- Best Regards, --raman ------------------------------------------------------------ IBM Research: Human Language Technologies Phone: 1 (408) 927 2608 Fax: 1 (408) 927 3012 Email: tvraman@us.ibm.com WWW: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman.asc Snail: IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road San Jose 95120
Received on Friday, 13 July 2001 11:38:11 UTC