- From: T. V. Raman <tvraman@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:36:02 -0700
- To: joern turner <joern.turner@web.de>
- Cc: tvraman@almaden.ibm.com, www-forms@w3.org
schema is to validate the instance.
The XForms model consists of the instance and schema --
the instance you populate --the schema you use to validate
against after the instance is populated.
Reason I define above here is that
in general hoping to asemble a rich xml tree by looking at
the binding expressions is likely to be intractable.
>>>>> "joern" == joern turner <joern.turner@web.de> writes:
joern> Hello, before starting i should state that i'm
joern> really welcome the work about the
joern> repeat-element. this solves a contiuous and
joern> repeating ;) problem especially in web
joern> form-processing.
joern> from my understanding of the draft, the structure
joern> of the instance can be constructed without
joern> referring to a schema - simply by extracting this
joern> information out of the binding-expression used in
joern> the XForms UI. if this is not right, some or all
joern> of the following may be irrelevant.
joern> T. V. Raman wrote:
>> Hi -- you're correct in that there is no way to
>> reassemble a list of items on the server because of
>> how WWW form post works today.
>>
>> However there is nothing inside the specification for
>> repeat that claims we preserve order --perhaps we
>> should make it even clearer.
joern> Yes, you're right. That was just an assumption i
joern> silently made. But, would'nt the user expect to
joern> get the data back in the order they have been
joern> inputted? Wouldn't the notion of a 'document
joern> order' as it is common in XML be destroyed?
joern> second, -- assuming you have a list of lists in
joern> your instance-data which you use as initial data
joern> (presets) or a preloaded instance, it is not
joern> possible to reconstruct this list in a submit
joern> without the usage of positional predicates. The
joern> result (again the example from the draft) would
joern> simply be:
joern> <items> <item> <f1>first</f1> <f2>first</fi>
joern> <f1>second</f1> <f2>second</f2> <f1>third</f1>
joern> <f2>third</f2> </item> </items>
joern> which is clearly a different semantic. maybe i'm
joern> on the wrong track here, but i'm using the
joern> algorithm which is described for
joern> instance-initialization: evaluating the binding
joern> expression from left to right and creating
joern> appropriate children for each step, if it does
joern> not exist already. although the brilliant
joern> simplicity of that algorithm would get
joern> complicated by positions, i couldn't think of any
joern> other way to preserve the input order which i (as
joern> you might have guessed by now) consider essential
joern> for the usefullness of repeat. otherwise i would
joern> urge the application using the XForms processor
joern> to achieve this some way - which may be
joern> complicated.
>> Incidentally I'm surprized you raised this in
>> connection with repeat --and not selectMany --both
>> have the same problem --only difference is that
>> selectMany is populating a schema list --repeat is
>> populating something with more substructure
joern> not exactly. - a selectMany (in html e.g. mapped
joern> to a <select multiple="true" ...) will be send as
joern> a single parameter: with parameter-name and an
joern> array of values. The selected values occur in the
joern> order they're displayed in the list. - at least
joern> when you're using the serlvet-api to parse
joern> parameters.
joern> please excuse my lengthy explanations but as i
joern> can hardly think of an application which does not
joern> rely on some kind of 'natural' order, this seems
joern> to be an important topic to me.
>>
--
Best Regards,
--raman
------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Research: Human Language Technologies
Phone: 1 (408) 927 2608
Fax: 1 (408) 927 3012
Email: tvraman@us.ibm.com
WWW: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman.asc
Snail: IBM Almaden Research Center,
650 Harry Road
San Jose 95120
Received on Friday, 13 July 2001 11:38:11 UTC