- From: Douglas Smith <nanoworks@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:59:51 -0800 (PST)
- To: Dominic Cooney <coonsta@ozemail.com.au>, www-forms@w3.org
A project myself and a few others have been working on is FAR FROM COMPLIANT but available now at http://xform.nanoworks.org I've been reviewing the working draft recently and am working on a number of improvements and changes that will edge it closer toward the spec (basic binding expressions, a better interface to instance data, syntax changes...). Help and feedback are definitely appreciated. CVS coming soon. Douglas Smith dug@nanoworks.com --- Dominic Cooney <coonsta@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au> > To: <xforms@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:44 AM > Subject: Fw: Looking for XForms Processor > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au> > > To: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:27 PM > > Subject: Re: Looking for XForms Processor > > > > > > > I have developed a small, non-conforming subset of XForms as a > server-side > > > taglib for JSP developers. > > > > > > It uses JAXP, Apache Xalan and ORO to deliver a small but useful > subset > of > > > functionality. It was a university project (i.e. purely > exploratory and > > not > > > intended for deployment) but I could copy it to you if you're > interested. > > > > > > Briefly, it supports: > > > > > > - string, number, boolean > > > - pattern, minLength, maxLength, minInclusive, minExclusive, > maxInclusive, > > > maxExclusive > > > - some simple syntax > > > - textbox, checkbox, exclusiveSelect, submit > > > - groupbox, caption > > > > > > But there are lots of other limitations (e.g. every UI element > must be > in > > a > > > groupbox, some bugs in support for submit protocol, no dynamic > > expressions, > > > etc., etc.) > > > > > > Other developers: I've whet my appetite. Is anybody interested in > trying > > to > > > do a fuller implementation with a tighter focus on conformance? > > > > > > Dominic Cooney > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk> > > > To: <www-forms@w3.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:50 PM > > > Subject: Looking for XForms Processor > > > > > > > > > > The XForms specification looks nice, but is there any tool > already > (e.g. > > > an XForms Processor) for practical use of this specification, or > the > only > > > way is to create one? > > > > > > > > Tibor Beck, ICL Slovakia. > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 19:00:03 UTC