- From: Dominic Cooney <coonsta@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:45:25 +1000
- To: <www-forms@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au> To: <xforms@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Fw: Looking for XForms Processor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dominic Cooney" <coonsta@ozemail.com.au> > To: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 8:27 PM > Subject: Re: Looking for XForms Processor > > > > I have developed a small, non-conforming subset of XForms as a server-side > > taglib for JSP developers. > > > > It uses JAXP, Apache Xalan and ORO to deliver a small but useful subset of > > functionality. It was a university project (i.e. purely exploratory and > not > > intended for deployment) but I could copy it to you if you're interested. > > > > Briefly, it supports: > > > > - string, number, boolean > > - pattern, minLength, maxLength, minInclusive, minExclusive, maxInclusive, > > maxExclusive > > - some simple syntax > > - textbox, checkbox, exclusiveSelect, submit > > - groupbox, caption > > > > But there are lots of other limitations (e.g. every UI element must be in > a > > groupbox, some bugs in support for submit protocol, no dynamic > expressions, > > etc., etc.) > > > > Other developers: I've whet my appetite. Is anybody interested in trying > to > > do a fuller implementation with a tighter focus on conformance? > > > > Dominic Cooney > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Beck Tibor" <tibor.beck@icl.sk> > > To: <www-forms@w3.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:50 PM > > Subject: Looking for XForms Processor > > > > > > > The XForms specification looks nice, but is there any tool already (e.g. > > an XForms Processor) for practical use of this specification, or the only > > way is to create one? > > > > > > Tibor Beck, ICL Slovakia. > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2001 16:43:46 UTC