- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:41:58 -0700
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFDA784ADA.281A6195-ON88257317.0003BC23-88257317.0003DAF1@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Elliotte, This will be fixed and diff-marked in XForms 1.0 Third Edition, which is nearly complete at this point. (It's already fixed in the source XML for the spec). Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> 07/11/2007 05:14 AM To John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA cc www-forms-editor@w3.org Subject Re: editorial: 7.11.1 The instance() Function John Boyer wrote: > > Hi Elliotte, > > Thanks for taking the time to report this. It turns out that someone > else also noted this in last call. An editor's draft of the post last > call spec (both with and without diff marking) is available from the > Forms WG page. This spec is subject to very frequent update as the last > call comments are addressed, but in it you will see that this particular > issue has already been fixed. > There may be a little confusion on version here. It sounds like you're referring to XForms 1.1. I was reporting this minor bug against XForms 1.0. It should be addressed in the 1.0 errata in case there's ever a 3rd edition. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 00:42:36 UTC