- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:56:05 +0100
- To: suzuki toshiya <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
Hello suzuki, Monday, November 11, 2013, 5:24:06 AM, you wrote: > The discussion seems to be saying as WOFF has an ambiguity about > the permission of the usage of the transferred WOFF, thus, WOFF > is not suitable to embed in the offline document. I'm not sure > why a conversion to OpenType is expected to be a solution... Yes, unless the OpenType has a different license agreement to the WOFF (I have never seen this case) then I don't see how they differ at all. > Regards, > mpsuzuki > On 11/11/2013 01:15 PM, Chris Lilley wrote: >> Hello Www-font, >> >> Spotted recently: >> >> "Which means that fonts in the WOFF format, even free ones, cannot >> be used offline. >> >> Free fonts in the WOFF format may thus have to be converted to >> OpenType prior to packaging. " >> http://www.w3.org/Style/2013/paged-media-tasks#embedded-fonts >> >> I'm wondering how that conclusion is arrived at; not clear it is >> correct. >> -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 06:56:09 UTC