- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:23:00 +0000
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Agree. I am wondering who came up with this conclusion and why - we do have a precedence when fonts in WOFF format *can* be used offline as part of the EPUB package. It would be good to open up a dialog with the owner of that task to clarify things. Vlad > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 11:15 PM > To: www-font@w3.org > Subject: WOFF can't be used offline (claim) > > Hello Www-font, > > Spotted recently: > > "Which means that fonts in the WOFF format, even free ones, cannot be > used offline. > > Free fonts in the WOFF format may thus have to be converted to OpenType > prior to packaging. " > http://www.w3.org/Style/2013/paged-media-tasks#embedded-fonts > > I'm wondering how that conclusion is arrived at; not clear it is > correct. > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:chris@w3.org >
Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 04:23:25 UTC