What Liam said (especially about it being an exciting proposal :) More seriously, yes, I did not mean to imply that it's a done deal. I meant the hypothetical projection assuming the new proposal is implemented and adopted. Liam's wording would have been, in fact, better. Also, I just ran a rough estimate, and something in the ballpark 75% of the installed base is now WOFF capable. That's up from an estimated 57.11% (desktop) as of July 20, 2011 ( http://www.kombinat-typefounders.com/store/catalog/article/woff_support/), so support is increasing fast. Raph On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 17:06 -0700, Raph Levien wrote: > > [...] > > > I suspect > > that the time gap between, say, 95% of the installed base of browsers > being > > able to support WOFF and 95% of the installed base being able to support > > WOFF 2 is, in fact, going to be pretty slim. > > s/is, in fact/would be, in fact/ -- let's not imply "Woff 2" is a done > deal just yet... although yes, the proposal is exciting! > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > >
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2012 01:03:05 UTC