- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 04:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > * the 'font-variant-position' property is defined independent of > > the existing use of the font-size/vertical-align properties to > > synthesize subscripts/superscripts > > I can't quite tell from your email what you're suggesting this should > do. I *think* it's asking for a property that switches to sub/sup > glyphs if they all exist, otherwise falls back to synthesized, and has > no special interaction with line-height/font-size/etc. This would > mean that existing <sub>/<sup> styling wouldn't change - it would > continue being fully synthetic unless we change the default > stylesheet. Correct? Right. * subscript/superscript variant glyphs are only used if all characters are supported by the font * default styling of sub/sup remains unchanged, synthesis occurs using the existing font-size/vertical-align swizzling An author using 'font-variant-position' would need to override the rules for sub/sup, as shown in the example in the spec. Cheers, John
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 11:23:04 UTC