- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:21:24 +0100
- To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011, 3:56:13 PM, Tal wrote: TL> On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Chris Lilley wrote: >> On a third hand, the assertion could be broadened to include authoring tools which perform round-trip or bidirectional conversion,and would be testable (perhaps the bitwise-identical authoring tool tests already cover this). TL> The Authoring Tool cases invalidsfnt-searchrange-001, TL> invalidsfnt-entryselector-001 and invalidsfnt-rangeshift-001 have TL> invalid values for these fields for SFNT input testing. Good, but that seems to be a different test. Its about conversion from sfnt to woff. The quoted spec text is about conversion from woff (which does not explicitly store these values) to sfnt (so they need to be correctly calculated). -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 18:21:29 UTC