- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:59:01 +0100
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 4:16:26 PM, Bert wrote: BB> 2) I like the clear and careful language in the introduction. (So BB> this is not an issue, not even a criticism, but it *is* a BB> comment. :-) ) Especially the way it explains what WOFF is not (a new BB> font format), and what it is for (@font-face). BB> That doesn't meant there will be no confusion, but I think the spec BB> does as well as it can. EXI can explain that it is just XML with a BB> syntax optimized for streaming, but people still see it as a new BB> format. With WOFF it will be the same. Thank you. We are glad you like it. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 14:59:06 UTC