On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>wrote: > In any case, I assume you will file a formal objection with all three WGs > concerned. As HTML5 currently depends on css3-fonts to define this behavior > and you clearly believe that to be incorrect, you will also object and > demand that they define this behavior as part of HTML5, right ? > Again, you are wrong. HTML5 only refers to css3-fonts once, in the following: For fonts The origin <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#origin> of a downloadable Web font is equal to the origin<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#origin> of the absolute URL <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#absolute-url> used to obtain the font (after any redirects). [CSSFONTS]<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#refsCSSFONTS> This says nothing about using css3-fonts to define same origin behavior. You know Slyvain, I don't know you, but I have not impugned your knowledge or reasonableness in this thread. On the other hand, every contribution of yours to this thread has been expressed to one degree or another in an ironic and frankly, a contemptuous tone. You should try being civil for a change. G.
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 18:26:56 UTC