Re: [www-font] WOFF metadata - should we require (rather than recommend) the use of UTF-8? from Robert O'Callahan on 2011-06-01 (www-font@w3.org from April to June 2011)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:52:52 +1200
To: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Cc: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font@w3.org
Message-ID: <BANLkTikNn7YfY0YWrn_eo3qD9gv0f_Jgjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp> wrote:

> Could you describe the expected advantage to exclude
> UTF-16?
>

It's a lot simpler for anything consuming this data.

Rob
-- 
"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 03:54:51 UTC