W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Including WOFF in ACID3

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:59:38 +0200
Message-ID: <19637.62346.380959.715874@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Also sprach Sylvain Galineau:

 > The current test loads this font as a raw TTF only. It would seem
 > appropriate for the test to be updated with a WOFF version of the
 > test font i.e. instead of just:
 > 	@font-face { font-family: "AcidAhemTest"; src: url(font.ttf); }
 > ...the test rule would be:
 > 	@font-face { font-family: "AcidAhemTest"; src: url(font.woff), url(font.ttf); }

I don't support this change. I think there's a value to keeping things
stable. Errors should be corrected, but -- in general, unless there
are obvious reasons -- I don't think features should be added or

Aslo, by making the proposed change, it becomes possible to pass Acid3
without supporting ttf. We could end up in a situation where browser x
support ttf only and browser y support woff only, but both of them
pass Acid3. As a result, interoperability would suffer.

I'm happy to add WOFF to a future Acid test, though.


              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 18:00:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:35 UTC