- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:01:31 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Well Tab, you know I tried :) We can talk about this face to face later this month. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr. > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:40 AM > To: Håkon Wium Lie > Cc: Chris Lilley; www-font@w3.org > Subject: Re: FtF Meeting > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> > wrote: > > Indeed. Thanks goes to W3C staff for finding consensus around WOFF. > As > > a result, the web will be a better place; for browser vendors, web > > site developers, and font vendors it will be a more predictable place. > > If CWT is killed, that just means it'll still be a decade before I can > ship a site without doubling all my @font-face rules and producing two > versions of every font file. This is not a win for us web developers, > when there is such an easy path to solving this. > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 17:02:28 UTC